Comparison of cluster software

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Digg Digg
Furl Furl
Reddit Reddit
Rojo Rojo
Add to OnlyWire

Under construction. Please help if you can.

The following tables compare general and technical information for notable computer cluster software. This article is not all-inclusive and may become out of date quickly.


Contents

General information

Software Maintainer Development status ArchitectureOCS High-Performance/High-Throughput Computing License Platforms supported Cost
Condor ‌ University Of Wisconsin CS dep actively developed Distributed master/executions/submits node HTC Apache license v2.0 Platform (Unix-like, Windows Free
Globus Toolkit Globus Alliance, Argonne National Laboratory actively developed SOA Grid Linux Free
Beowulf clusters
Alchemi
Amoeba
Base One Foundation Component Library
Distributed objects
DragonFly BSD
Fujitsu SynfiniWay
GreenTea Software
Gridbus Toolkit
GridMP Univa UD (formerly United Devices) actively developed Windows, Linux, Macintosh OS X, Solaris Cost
JPPF
Platform OCS v5
PBS GridWorks Altair actively developed Cost
Platform LSF [1] Platform Computing actively developed HPC/HTC commercial Unix,Linux,Windows Cost
NetworkComputer ‌ RTDA Runtime Design Automation actively developed Distributed client-server multi-cluster HTC/HPC commercial Unix-like, Windows time-based license
Popular Power
ProActive
RPyC Tomer Filiba actively developed MIT License *nix / Windows Free
Sun Grid Engine Sun Microsystems GridEngine Team actively developed Master node / exec clients, multiple admin/submit nodes HPC/HTC SISSL *nix / Windows Free (paid support available)
Torque Cluster Resources, Inc. actively developed Free
UNICORE
Vaakya
XGE
Xgrid
Software Maintainer Development status Architecture High-Performance/High-Throughput Computing License Platforms supported Cost


Table Explanation

  • Software: The name of the application that is described.

Technical information

Software programation language Authentification Encryption Integrity Global File System Global File System + Kerberos Heterogeneous /Homogeneous exec node Jobs priority Group priority Queue type SMP aware Max exec node Max job submitted CPU scavenging Parallel job Job checkpointing
Platform LSF [2] yes Yes to start jobs. Did it suspend job when the person come back? Yes
Condor ‌ C++, GSI,SSL,Kerberos, Password,File System, Remote File System, Windows, Claim To Be, Anonymous None, 3DES, BLOWFISH None, MD5 None, NFS, AFS Not official, hack with ACL and NFS4 Heterogeneous Yes Yes Fair-share with some programmability basic (hard separation into different node) tested ~10000? tested ~100000? Yes MPI, OpenMP, PVM Yes

Table Explanation

  • Software: The name of the application that is described.
  • SMP aware:
  * basic: hard split into multiple virtual host
  * basic+: hard split into multiple virtual host with some minimal/incomplete communication between virtual host on the same computer
  * dynamic: split the resource of the computer(CPU/Ram) on demand.

Features

todo

Software Atomic commits File renames Merge file renames Symbolic links Pre/post-event hooks Signed revisions Merge tracking End of line conversions Tags International Support
AccuRev Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A ?

Table Explanation

  • Software: The name of the application that is described.

User interfaces

todo

Software Web interfaces Stand-alone GUIs Integration and/or Plug-ins for IDEs
AccuRev Yes Windows, Linux, Unix, Mac OS X, BeOS available IDEA (AccuRev4IDEA)
Aldon Yes Windows  ?

Table Explanation

  • Software: The name of the application that is described.

History and adoption

...

Notes

See also

External links

...

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_cluster_software"

This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Giant Panda

Mercedes Car
James Bond Guide
This site monitored by SitePinger.net