Concurrent Version System

Poll without page-refresh

Article on other languages:

	del.icio.us
	Digg
	Furl
	Reddit
	Rojo
	Add to OnlyWire

This article or section is missing citations or needs footnotes.
Using inline citations helps guard against copyright violations and factual inaccuracies. (November 2007)

Concurrent Versions System
Developed by	The CVS Team
Initial release	November 19, 1990 (1990-11-19)
Latest release	1.11.23 / 8 May 2008; 210 days ago
Preview release	1.12.13 / 26 July 2006; 862 days ago
Written in	C
OS	Unix-like, Windows
Type	Revision control
License	GNU General Public License
Website	http://www.nongnu.org/cvs

In the field of software development, the Concurrent Versions System (CVS), also known as the Concurrent Versioning System, is a free software revision control system. Version control system software keeps track of all work and all changes in a set of files, and allows several developers (potentially widely separated in space and/or time) to collaborate. Dick Grune developed CVS in the 1980s. CVS has become popular in the open source software world and is released under the GNU General Public License.

1 Features
2 Terminology
3 History and status
- 3.1 Relationship with GNU
4 Limitations
5 See also
- 5.1 IDEs with support for CVS
6 References
7 External links

Features

CVS uses a client-server architecture: a server stores the current version(s) of a project and its history, and clients connect to the server in order to "check out" a complete copy of the project, work on this copy and then later "check in" their changes. Typically, the client and server connect over a LAN or over the Internet, but client and server may both run on the same machine if CVS has the task of keeping track of the version history of a project with only local developers. The server software normally runs on Unix (although at least the CVSNT server supports various flavors of Microsoft Windows and Linux), while CVS clients may run on any major operating-system platform.

Several developers may work on the same project concurrently, each one editing files within their own "working copy" of the project, and sending (or checking in) their modifications to the server. To avoid the possibility of people stepping on each other's toes, the server will only accept changes made to the most recent version of a file. Developers are therefore expected to keep their working copy up-to-date by incorporating other people's changes on a regular basis. This task is mostly handled automatically by the CVS client, requiring manual intervention only when a conflict arises between a checked-in modification and the yet-unchecked local version of a file.

If the check-in operation succeeds, then the version numbers of all files involved automatically increment, and the CVS-server writes a user-supplied description line, the date and the author's name to its log files. CVS can also run external, user-specified log processing scripts following each commit. These scripts are installed by an entry in CVS's loginfo file, which can trigger email notification or convert the log data into a Web-based format.

Clients can also compare versions, request a complete history of changes, or check out a historical snapshot of the project as of a given date or as of a revision number. Many open-source projects allow "anonymous read access", a feature pioneered by OpenBSD. This means that clients may check out and compare versions with either a blank or simple published password (e.g., "anoncvs"); only the check-in of changes requires a personal account and password in these scenarios.

Clients can also use the "update" command in order to bring their local copies up-to-date with the newest version on the server. This eliminates the need for repeated downloading of the whole project.

CVS can also maintain different "branches" of a project. For instance, a released version of the software project may form one branch, used for bug fixes, while a version under current development, with major changes and new features, can form a separate branch.

CVS uses delta compression for efficient storage of different versions of the same file. The implementation favors files with many lines (usually text files) - in extreme cases the system may store individual copies of each version rather than deltas.

In the world of open source software, the Concurrent Version System (CVS) has long been the tool of choice for version control. And rightly so. CVS itself is free software, and its non-restrictive modus operandi and support for networked operation – which allow dozens of geographically dispersed programmers to share their work – fits the collaborative nature of the open-source world very well. CVS and its semi-chaotic development model have become cornerstones of open-source.

– Collins-Sussman, Version Control with Subversion For Subversion 1.1, 2005

Terminology

CVS labels a single project (set of related files) which it manages a module. A CVS server stores the modules it manages in its repository. Programmers acquire copies of modules by checking out. The checked-out files serve as a working copy, sandbox or workspace. Changes to the working copy will be reflected in the repository by committing them. To update is to acquire or merge the changes in the repository with the working copy.

History and status

CVS developed from an earlier versioning-system called Revision Control System (RCS), still^[update] in use, which manages individual files but not whole projects. Dick Grune has provided some brief historical notes about CVS on his site. To quote:

I created CVS to be able to cooperate with my students, Erik Baalbergen and Maarten Waage, on the ACK (Amsterdam Compiler Kit) C compiler. The three of us had vastly different schedules (one student was a steady 9-5 worker, the other was irregular, and I could work on the project only in the evenings). Their project ran from July 1984 to August 1985. CVS was initially called cmt, for the obvious reason that it allowed us to commit versions independently.

– Dick Grune, Dick Grune's website

Grune publicly released the code to mod.sources on June 23, 1986: Google Groups continues to archive and serve the original usenet post.

The code that eventually evolved into the current version of CVS started with Brian Berliner in April 1989, with later input from Jeff Polk and many other contributors. Brian Berliner wrote a paper introducing his improvements to the CVS program which describes how the tool was extended and used internally by Prisma, a third-party developer working on the SunOS kernel, and was released for the benefit of the community under the GPL. On November 19, 1990, CVS version 1.0 was submitted to the Free Software Foundation for development and distribution.^[1]

CVS introduced the implementation of branching into version-control systems: the branching techniques in other systems all derive from the CVS implementation as documented in 1990 ^[2].

CVS has always solidly supported distributed, multi-site and offline operations due to the unreliability of the few computer-networks that existed at the time CVS evolved.

A group of volunteers currently maintains the CVS code. Notably, the development of the Microsoft Windows version of CVS has split off into a separate project named CVSNT and has been more active in extending the feature set of the system, even porting the changes back to the UNIX platform under the name CVSNT.

Relationship with GNU

Historically, the relationship between CVS and the GNU project could appear somewhat ambiguous: the GNU Web site distributed the program, labelling it "GNU package" on one page and "other GPL-licensed project" on another. Clarification came recently^[update] when CVS development moved from cvshome.org to savannah.nongnu.org, with CVS officially assigned to the non-gnu category. On the FTP site, the program has traditionally resided in the /non-gnu/ directory and still does.

Limitations

For each commonly listed limitation of CVS there exists a commonly listed reason. The developers of CVS insist that the following properties of CVS are not shortcomings, but features that were carefully planned, designed and implemented into CVS:

CVS does not version the moving or renaming of files and directories. It was implemented this way because in the past Refactoring was avoided in development processes. More recently the thinking has changed and refactoring can be managed by an administrator (by directly moving the RCS file in the repository, provided that the administrator knows what he or she is doing) as it is required. If you develop in Oracle Forms, Cobol, Fortran or even C++ then the CVS reasoning is quite commonly accepted; if you develop with Java then the CVS reasoning may seem counterintuitive.
No versioning of symbolic links. Symbolic links stored in a version control system can pose a security risk - someone can create a symbolic link index.htm to /etc/passwd and then store it in the repository; when the "code" is exported to a Web server the Web site now has a copy of the system security file available for public inspection. A developer may prefer the convenience and accept the responsibility to decide what is safe to version and what is not; a project manager or auditor may prefer to reduce the risk by using build scripts that require certain privileges and conscious intervention to execute.
Limited support for Unicode and non-ASCII filenames. Many Unix systems run in UTF-8 and so CVS on such systems handles UTF-8 filenames natively. For programmers working on Unix systems all with the same encoding then this response seems reasonable; but it causes problems when multiple encodings are used, perhaps because clients are running another OS, such as AS/400 or Windows).
No atomic commit. The network and server used should have sufficient resilience that a commit can complete without either crashing. In many code management processes, development work is performed on branches (for example, add feature A1234), and then merged into the trunk after code review - that final merge is 'atomic' and performed in the data center by QA. The term atomic is sometimes referred to in the transactional database sense where a commit will automatically roll back should it fail for any reason, and sometimes referred to in the sense that each commit can be uniquely identified. If each commit needs to be tracked then this can be handled by modifying the correct trigger.
Expensive branch operations. CVS assumes that the majority of work will take place on the trunk — branches should generally be short-lived or historical. When used as designed, branches are easily managed and branch operations are efficient and fast.
CVS treats files as textual by default. Text files should be the primary file type stored in the CVS repository. Binary files are supported and files with a particular file extension can automatically be recognised as being binary. Many Unix systems run in UTF-8 and so CVS on such systems handles UTF-8 files natively, however when the underlying OS does not , such as AS/400 or Windows) care must be taken.
No support for distributed revision control or unpublished changes. Programmers should commit changes to the files often for frequent merging and rapid publication to all users.

Over time, developers have wanted to change the CVS code significantly to add new features, refactor the code, alter the operational model and improve developers' productivity. This has led to the phrase YACC: "Yet Another CVS Clone" (itself a play on the Unix command named, yacc, which stands for "yet another compiler compiler"). CVS replacement projects include CVSNT (first released 1998), EVS (currently in beta as of 31 August 2007), OpenCVS (not released as of 27 August 2008) and Subversion (initially released in 2004^[3]) and numerous systems to support distributed revision control.