User talk:74.78.162.229

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Digg Digg
Furl Furl
Reddit Reddit
Rojo Rojo
Add to OnlyWire

This is a leased IP which en.wikipedia.org logs show to have been first used by the first user below. Please add a section if you are now it's sole leaseholder.

Contents

Ethelred the Unready

74.78.162.229 (talk) 23:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Has been leased by Lycurgus since at least 2007-11 and is semi-static.
Obviously I can edit my user space anonymously if I like and will continue to do so.
Other edits by this account that are reverted I generally will leave reverted.

Next IP: User talk:72.228.150.44

Current Article Threads A-Z

Add your § below or use Lycurgus' talk page.


Acculturation

rm stale:


Anti-capitalism and Critique of capitalism

Resolved as per audit trail in the two English articles. Nothing changed in de.wikipedia.org .74.78.162.229 (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


Baxter Black

Updated

A well known feature of NPR so secondary source(s) shouldn't be hard to find. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


Drama

General maintenance performed.


History of direct democracy in the United States

Content on that talk page marshalled for the tag issue. updated

pending review.

I may address the tag issues but will develop a draft in my wiki instance first. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 22:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Keats

Why Not

Answer - the "edit" function is on the right, so it screws up the code when the things are reversed. Ottava Rima (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Not really an answer, and also false (current standard layout never floats the edit controls left) but the policy stated above applies. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
To be clear, I'm aware that there can be misfloats of the edit control, and I don't (knowingly) create same. They occur fairly commonly in large pages which aren't primarily text whatever the layout if someone doesn't apply the needed attention. The page in question is not large but IIRC does have a lot of images for its size. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 19:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Also I test for a (reasonable) variety of browsers where changes merit it (see my home page for a list). 74.78.162.229 (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Actually, what you seemed to not understand is by screwing up the code, I am referring to the bar that separates the various columns. The edit side can move in when an object is on the right, but there is a screw up between images when there is a large image on the left. MoS states that nothing on the left should override the separator. Ottava Rima (talk) 23:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Acknowledged. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 23:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Natural language processing

Tag maintenance/merge, talk maintenance for projects, ratings, merges. etc. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


Natural language understanding

Cleanedup and posted to and from tags for suggested merge with natural language processing. I actually think it should be an article in its own right but doubt any one wants to do it justice. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 21:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

That and of course anything good is likely to prompt a tag war since obviously it's all about OR. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 21:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Prime Directive Cite and Original Tags

Both I think were stale and out of date with current state, the cite certainly as there appear to be about 10. This is probably the main conceit of the series, and the series themselves are very well known. I will review for anything at variance with the series episodes I'm familiar with. There can be no authority for a work of fiction other than itself, so Paramount or even Roddenberry aren't actually the authority for what is in these episodes, the episodes themselves are. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 22:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

So it is the Implications and Criticism §§ which are the basis of

if removing the tag were an overriding value these sections might be rewritten to comply but that would be the wrong thing to do since their content would almost certainly suffer, so this tag needs to remain. Note that the relation of the sentence in the beginning about the Return of the Archons is unclear and could use a rewrite. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


Ripple monetary system

rm

from the External Links § and download ripplesite_0.2a.tar.gz for evalution.

update

to now pending review of article, tarball, and project website content. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 23:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)


Ulam spiral

Reworded sentence for factiicty and removed its fact check. One doesn't have to prove a negative unless there is a substantive positive. What is unexplained is the geometrical pattern in terms of number, group, model, or some other mathematical theory. It is possible one could take this as a construction, i.e. a geometric definition of the prime numbers (like cantor diagonalization) in which case it's a matter of reconceptualizing the situation. You'd still need a proof or at least a conjecture of why the arithmetic and geometric definitons were equivalent though and that's the sort of thing that is unexplained. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 20:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

justifications for changes should go in the article talk page, not in your personal talk page --FvdP (talk) 20:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Acknowledged. 74.78.162.229 (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I copied your comment there for possible further discussion. --FvdP (talk) 20:34, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Next Leaseholder Here

n(en)+



This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.


Giant Panda

Mercedes Car
James Bond Guide
This site monitored by SitePinger.net