|
MMBHey! Thanks for creating the MMB page; i had put it on a vague list of things to do, but i'm glad someone beat me to it. Cheers, Lindsay 12:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Well at least you're a fellow smokerre: Thanks for the courtesy... admittedly, I was late night winging it, but back in the days I did microprocessor designs (5) load capacitance was a big deal in board layout design and remedial measures. Doubly so in backplane architectures, so perhaps MOS technology has improved... it's been a while since I looked at any chips specs--well over a decade and a half now that I think about it. Admittedly chip technology has advanced a few quantum, and runs are so much shorter now that much is no longer a first order effect but it was also my understanding that data through rates were still clocked way below processor tic rates. I KNOW my desktop, with 2Ghz processor has a data clock of 4Mhz, so perhaps you need to check a bit further before throwing out that baby with the bath water. Perhaps 4 Mhz is no longer the ceiling, but then I've been away from hardware aspects for a long while. The excess-to-and-off-topic is admittedly something I knew, but at that hour, after 15-20 phrasings and rephrasings and moving this sentence there or here... figured I'd revise and extend some other day. Frankly, it was a very unplanned edit, solely triggered by the fact that I WAS AND AM TOTALLY AMAZED such fundamentals weren't covered exhaustively AND WELL three or four years back. See Data bus for a good CRY. Don't look hard... it's not there, and neither is I/O bus that I can find. Bus (computing) is so busy linking other articles it doesn't educate either. Last I looked we were an educational project of an educational foundation... has that changed? So far as I can see the article is very poor as is... so fix it. It really doesn't convey to anyone outside the computer fields anything about how a bus works and why its important... Your VESA local bus reference is really off point. Local bus optimized for word DMA transfers is not the main memory address bus, but I am and was aware there a are a relatively few installations using full word addressing without byte capability... THAT is information that should be buried if mentioned at all... why confuse people you're trying to give the basics. As the article stands, on a quality scale 1-5, it tops out at .5, so you want to revert... I don't revert. But suggest you get your writers hat on and start servicing the customers per WP:NOT PAPERS. ANY IDIOT trained in the field can through jargon into a page. It takes skilled writing and a lot of effort to convey information clearly that is not depedent upon linking to get the gist across so Johnny Nineyearsold can see whats what. I tend to avoid professional topics for ones more in line with avocations like geology and history, but if computer topics go on needing TLC, you'll see me take a hand when needed. I've already put data bus on my TO-DO Bookmarks, surprise me and beat me to it. Sorry about the delay, I saw your post immediately upon arrival, but have been busy here, on the commons and wikiversity with ongoing matters. One of those on Wikiversity lead me to this edit. Nuf said. // Fra 05:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC) ping!. I'm a bit overbusy! //Fra 22:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC) RE: RMOh bloody hell you're right. That'll teach me to edit at 2am. Excuse me while I go fix all of that (also, I did try to keep the Research Machines name on some articles where it would be historically correct, I guess I missed some of those too). --carelesshx talk 11:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC) THANKS for fair warning!!!! (Windows 3.x)Its extremely considerate to post in both discussion page and mine before reverting-- Although I would much rather you rewrite and/or correct elements you find objectionable. Please google "AARD code." I reviewed Wikipedia notability guidelines, so I base my edits here on published sources, not on flow or aesthetics of prose! I don't think the controversy can be explained with a simple statement and redirect to AARD code article, although feel free to make a case on the discussion page then follow your bliss. Yes I have a bias against M$, but I also have to wonder if you are a Microsoft apologist of sorts! I am certainly willing to accept selective edits based on NPOV, although realize AARD the basis for a settled lawsuit-- I have a wealth of info to draw upon. I think it is also a precedent for Microsoft's anticompetitive antitrust convictions- these aren't merely point-of-view biases!! Cheers! Cuvtixo (talk) 15:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
RfA questionThanks a lot for that, fixed. 20:26, 15 September 2008 (UTC) RollbackHiya. I've granted the rollback flag. Please remember to use it only for blatant vandalism. You can learn more at WP:RBK or feel free to ask me for any help. Thanks for your work so far and Happy Editing! Pedro : 18:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC) USB Flash DriveOops! Yeah, now that you mentioned it and I've had a chance to re-examine the page, you're correct. I feel rather dumb because I removed the tag thinking I was editing the article for external HDDs which in some cases, do require 2 ports. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② talk 00:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC) PrestonRe: Tulketh Mill chimney - many thanks for your correction. Do you think it warrants the addition of an image? Martinevans123 (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank YouMy apologies regarding Brian Regan. I was scanning wikipedia and found somebody had reverted ME! I thought this was strange as I have no history of vandalising and have no intention of ever doing so, and to prove this I have been granted Rollback rights which is most likely why our edits conflicted. I am hoping currently that the article is in a satisfactory state. Once again, sorry. Limideen 16:20, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 16:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Santa Cruz OperationThanks for letting my know about this. I'm usually wary of random I.P.s making accusations on pages, but you can never really take copyright concerns too seriously, so I thought I'd investigate further. Good news for me, now I don't have to go through rooting out copyrighted text from the article! :) Thanks again, – Toon(talk) 13:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
Mercedes Car
This site monitored by SitePinger.net