Please feel free to Leave a new message, unless you ask otherwise I will respond here, if you would like me to respond on your talk page please say so.
If I left a message on your talk page, please respond there. --User:Stealth500
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Archive for Talk:iTunes
Hi, I saw that you did a massive archive of for Talk:iTunes. However, that page was being taking care of by a automatic archive bot User:Miszabot. I reverted the change and since the page was getting too large, tweaked the parameters to do it more often. -- KelleyCook (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Stealth500, you created this page about 30 minutes ago but it remains empty. Was it a mistake? I tagged it for speedy deletion but you can always recreate it when you are ready to add content. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 11:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, thanks for your question on my talk page. The best place for you to start would be Wikipedia:Your first article, it contains a lot of information on how to get started on a new article. For your information, there is a Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, but this is for unregistered users who are technically unable to create articles on their own. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have tagged the page Talk:Star Wars/FA for speedy deletion under CSD G8 namely that it is a talk page for which there is no corresponding article. If you would like to contest this speedy deletion please add the {{hangon}} tag to the page in question but do not remove the tag. Thanks BigHairRef | Talk 17:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Rally Point (Travian) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 10:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Cayuga nation article
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Cayuga nation, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Deconstructhis (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
re: Cayuga nation article material
Hey.... so a few things wrong about your thing on my page.....
1st: How do you wish me to cite a source that was an interview that I was at. 2nd: I am not a new member....
Hello Stealth, if you haven't already taken the opportunity to sit down and read WP:VERIFY you should do so, I think you'll find some tips there that will make editing and adding to the encyclopedia a little easier. As I'm sure you understand, without the potential ability to verify the information that an individual editor adds to an article, Wikipedia becomes a much less useful tool for a reader who must have some way of knowing that the information that they're reading just simply isn't invented by an editor on the spot and has no basis in fact at all. In Wikipedia, that basis is established by an editor adding a reliable source to the material when they post it to an article. In your case, if you're citing an "interview" that was made available through a media outlet, it's definitely possible to simply include information in your citation regarding the details of when and where the material was made publicly available, you might want to use a template to help give you an idea of the sorts of details that are usually included in this type of citation, they can be found here WP:CITET. If the interview you're referring to took place in the context of a private conversation or a public event that can not be verified by a reliable third party source, I'm afraid it becomes very difficult to use material from it as a reference in Wikipedia. Even if you were there personally and heard the material spoken that you're referring to, without the ability to reference an independent source for that material, what you're doing by quoting it is called "original research" WP:OR and is not permitted in the encyclopedia. Please get back to me if you want to discuss this further, have fun editing. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 17:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)