User talk:Ultraexactzz

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Digg Digg
Furl Furl
Reddit Reddit
Rojo Rojo
Add to OnlyWire
Welcome to my User Talk page. I'll reply to any message you leave here on your talk page, unless you wish otherwise and say so. If I haven't answered you in a short time, it's possible that I am away from a computer at the moment - I assure you, I will get back to you. If you came here because of a deletion I performed, please make sure to note which article or image I deleted, as there's no way I can reply unless I know. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 20:14, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Archive
Archives
Archive 1  – Archive 2  – Archive 3  –
Archive 4  – Archive 5  – Archive 6

Contents

Deletion

Under other circumstances I'd tell you you have an awesome page.

After creating my account and looking through all the myriads of options and pages involved in being a new Wikipedian, part of that is looking at userboxes, and as I don't have my own computer, I simply saved the list of possibilities under hidden comment until I had time to go through them all. So, because I save my work-in-progess on my own page under hidden comment, which nobody is ever going to look at when there's no text on the page, the page was deleted. That is, I noticed the link to my page was red, said to myself "what the hell," and clicked the link which brought up a blank page and a deletion notice.

However, I am also confused, because clicking on "RayvnEQ" at the top of the menu bar shows me a page, and when I hit the edit button, it also shows me a list of hidden comment. Yet, the link to my page on my watchlist still appears red. I have no way of knowing whether the list of user boxes under hidden comment when I click "edit" from my menubar is complete. This whole thing is confusing but I need to make sure that 1) my page exists and 2) every userbox I had choosen for consideration to eliminate or keep from my user page when I finish it is kept within the hidden comment. (I do not own a computer, so I cannot keep a notepad file on said non-existent computer.) Also, some of the userboxes were on a hidden comment on the talk page of my name, because I mistakenly put them there, so I need to make sure those are still there as well. (And if so, I will move them to hidden on my actual page.) Please help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=RayvnEQ

~ Rayvn (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Cat:Language icons

I have nominated Cat:Language icons (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hi Ultraexactzz! Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed yesterday. I hope not to let you and the others down, and use the tools for the benefit of the project. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 22:51, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello

Just a question, how is it going with the Recommend phase of the RfA review, specifically when will each person's response be posted as in the anonymous responses. Where will you post them? Thanks (talk) 13:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

I moved the page to Family Online Safety Institute from my userpage. I just wanted to ask if you could double check to make sure it is successfully moved and appears to be working. also, thank you so much for all your patient help/edits with the page. I really appreciate it. Pastadog42 (talk) 02:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for your support in my RFA!!
• If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy •
19:37, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

regarding 79.73.115.236

I see you posted, lifting an autoblock. I'd suggest waiting a bit longer next time, or asking the blocking admin. This IP has not been used for anything other than Tom Sayle socks, as far back as CU can see. So there's no reason to lift the block, and no risk of collateral damage. The newest user is yet another sock. ++Lar: t/c 14:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections

Hi there,

I'm writing an article for the Signpost newspaper, and would like to ask you if you could just check my work so far, on the process part of the elections. I've just been in a discussion where someone said questions wouldn't be open until the 17th, and I wasn't aware of that. Since you've been quite active on that talk page, I thought you'd be able to help me and let me know if my work is accurate. Thanks. – How do you turn this on (talk) 21:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Ultraexactzz, pleased to meet you. Thank you for reverting the vandalism on the Jat people page.

The Jat people page has been under heavy anon vandal attack. The Sikh article (I also worked on the Sikh article last year) was under similar anon heavy vandal attack last year but a administrator semi protected the page indefinitely and us editors were able to create a very nice article. Please can you semi-protect the Jat people indefinitely so we can do similar job of producing a very good article without these constant vandal attacks.

Many anon users have been vandalising the article including the following user who keeps on vandalising the article by adding uncited information which is not correct. He has done this on the Kashmiri people article and many others, see his talk page. Here are the separate occasions:

He has been warned and blocked on many occasions but still continues, blocking him has no affect. He just changes ip:

The only long-term solution is a similar one to the one done by an admin on the Sikh article Semi-protect indefinitely this allow users to build a nice article without it being destroyed by anon vandals. Once the vandal disruption is gone someone can ask for un-protection. Please can you help us out here. Thank you.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you about Jat people

Thank you Ultraexactzz, it has helped but if this anon or others come back in 1 months time to vandalise again. We will need your help again and I will make a similar request for help. P.S. The reason why you have these anons vandalising the article is because it is about an ethnic group so similar reasons to why the Jewish people article is protected indefinitely, it is a high risk article for vandalism just like this article. Its a big set of people. It needs to be kept an eye on like the Jewish people article. I will come back to you if in 1 months time it starts up again. Thank you once again.--Peter johnson4 (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Ultraexactzz, thank you for your reply. Yes, agreed, we can take your "wait and see approach" if the article after 1 month is Ok with no anon vandal attacks then this is a acceptable situation. However, if after 1 month the same thing kicks off again with anons vandalizing the article and adding uncited information, then I really see no other responsible option but to semi-protect indefinitely to solve the problem once and for all. P.S I think your cat is very beautiful, Is it a girl or boy?--Peter johnson4 (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Request

Could you proffer some sage advice for a lady at my talk page User_talk:MBisanz#Could_you_be_my_knight_in_shining_armour, much thanks. MBisanz talk 22:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Misdirected soft redirect?

From looking at your contribs, where you were redirecting candidate question talk pages to the candidate vote talk pages, I think you might have copied and pasted the wrong link here. I think you meant to direct people to here, not here. If I have that right, would you be able to fix it? Carcharoth (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Look Man or woman

Look man or woman quit deleting other people stuff.I put alot of time in trying to develope the WCW Smackdown.So leave my page alone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Khooks0315 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ultraexactzz"

This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Giant Panda

Mercedes Car
James Bond Guide
This site monitored by SitePinger.net