|
Ready and waiting. Add the {{Rescue}} template to any article at AfD worth saving.
Please join us! All too often, an article about a perfectly notable topic lies wounded, badly written, unsourced — but should its life be taken at Articles for Deletion? No! Only articles about non-encyclopedic topics should be deleted, not articles that need improvement. Improvement is the opposite of deletion. An article should not be deleted just because it's ill-formed. Some writer worked hard on that article. Some reader can use that article. Those writers and readers, if reached out to, can help us preserve this worthwhile content. Why is it important to read Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion?Because of entropy it is easier to delete an article than to create one. Every time an article is deleted, the contributions that were made to it are lost. Wikipedia administrators can access the information in deleted articles, but they are not necessarily experts on the article's topic. Once an article is deleted, its content, value and appropriateness can no longer be evaluated by the general public. In addition, the contributor who writes a poor article on a notable topic is likely to be inexperienced. If their first efforts are deleted, they may be discouraged and refrain from creating further articles, or even editing. Everyone starts somewhere and we should encourage better writing and better articles. Good faith efforts to contribute should be met with encouragement to improve. This makes Articles for Deletion a very important place, one that deserves everyone's attention. A common axiom is that "AFD is not cleanup". Consider that Wikipedia is a work in progress and articles should not be deleted as punishment because no one has felt like cleaning them up yet. Remember, Wikipedia has no deadline. If there's good, eventually sourceable, content in the article, it should be developed and improved, not deleted. The question on whether a poor but improvable article ought to be deleted is a major point of contention, and has given rise to the wiki-philosophies immediatism and eventualism. What can one person do?In general, the Rescue Squadron is not about writing on talk pages as much as editing article pages. If everyone who cares about preserving important topics glances at one deletion discussion per day (or even one per week), reads through the imperiled article, and rewrites it if it is deserving, people will start to think about the differences between unencyclopedic writing and unencyclopedic topics -- and maybe they'll start contemplating improvement before they contemplate deletion. So the ARS are wild-eyed inclusionists?No. The Article Rescue Squadron (ARS) is not about casting keep votes or making policy simply to ensure that nothing is deleted. The ARS ensure that articles about notable topics do not get deleted when they can be rescued through normal editing which per WP:AFD means that it was not a good candidate for AfD. The {{So fix it}} and {{Solookitup}} templates are sometimes all that's required for a rescue. InstructionsWhat the Rescue template is for
What the Rescue template is not for
Flag an article for RescueIf an article has been tagged for deletion (the Afd tag) and you feel it meets the above guidelines then you can flag an article for Rescue by:
{{Rescue}} If you are the primary editor of an article tagged for deletion (the Afd tag) or are otherwise unsure if an article is a good candidate for the Article Rescue Squadron then please post a message including the article's title on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page. ExampleYou can flag an article for Rescue by editing it to add the bolded text under the AfD tag, but within the two sets of <!-- --> tags, as in the below example using a Robin Sage AfD:
Removing a rescue tagIt is unhelpful, and possibly disruptive, to remove the rescue tag before the AfD is completed. The AfD process usually takes less than a week and the tag is in place for less than that. Let the AfD closer remove it when the AfD tag is removed or the article is deleted. In all cases remain civil and assume good faith that other editors are working to improve articles. Tips to help rescue articles
Source searchesBarnstarsThere are three snazzy Rescue Barnstars for anyone who has made significant contributions to rescuing articles; it is up to those awarding them to choose which one to use:
How to become a member of Article Rescue SquadronTo join simply add your name to our membership list; feel free to add your ideas to the project discussion page as well. Then place this tag {{User Article Rescue Squadron}} on your user page:
Articles currently tagged for rescue
Selected previous rescues
See also
External links
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.
Mercedes Car
This site monitored by SitePinger.net