Wikipedia:CORE

del.icio.us del.icio.us
Digg Digg
Furl Furl
Reddit Reddit
Rojo Rojo
Add to OnlyWire
Shortcut:
WP:CORE
Wikipedia 1.0
Projects
(talk)(FAQ)
WP 1.0 bot list
(talk)(stats)
Selection bot(talk)
Version 0.7 bot selection

VersionIDsCopyedit (t)
Version 0.7 feedback

IRC channel (IRC)

Release criteria
Review team (FAQ)
Version 0.7 release
(manual selection) (t)
(Nominations) (t)
[You can help]
"Selection" project (Talk)

2008 schools selection


CORE TOPICS
CORE SUPPLEMENT

Core topics - 1,000
(Talk) (COTF) (bot)

TORRENT (Talk)
"Selection" project for kids ((t))
Schools project (Talk)|
WORK VIA WIKI
PROJECTS
(talk)
Pushing to 1.0 (talk)

Static content subcom.

The Core Topics subproject of the Version 1.0 Editorial Team is intended to identify and work toward improvement of the most important articles (realizing that "importance" is subjective). For the time being, our work is limited to about 150 articles, which are listed with comments in the table below. A supplementary list, similar in size, has been created to cover some other important subjects.

Contents

How you can help

If you're interested in helping, here are some good places to start.

Individually
  • Work on any article listed in the tree and update its status if needed. Especially, use the article status summary as a guide. The summary lists the best and worst of the core topics. (The "Start Class" topics are more than stubs but often need substantial work).
Collaborations

Background

This was begun December 4, 2004, by popular demand, more or less, to be a list of about 150 core subjects that would go in a "release" version of Wikipedia.

The list is small to be tightly focused. Articles on individual countries are core topics, but beyond the scope of this list because there are so many and their value is clear. Biographies are beyond the scope of this list, because there are multitudes and their value when considered individually is too subjective. Other contenders for core articles include articles on the English language, timelines, maps and any reference material.

Article status summary

Elite Eight
Article Quality Comments
Geography B
History B Badly organized, no in-line citations, POV issues
Humanities B Lacks information.
Mathematics A
Natural science* Start Needs to be expanded and referenced mainly.
Science* B Lacking in inline citations.
Social sciences Start
Personal life Start Needs a lead section split off, completely unreferenced.
Technology B Getting there

*Either Natural science or Science should be selected.

Continents

(including Oceania)

Featured Articles
Good Articles -- none
Fair quality
Short

Only about eight screens.

Only about five screens.

General

Tree

Culture and society, 15
Earth, 16
Humanities, 24
Life science and medicine, 19

Mathematics, 6: Algebra B | Geometry B | Mathematics GA/A | Number A | Statistics B | Calculus ?

Physical science, 29
Social science, 22
Technology, 18

Members

Similar lists

Subpages

This article is from Wikipedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.


Giant Panda

Mercedes Car
James Bond Guide
This site monitored by SitePinger.net