This is a WikiProject, a collaboration area and open group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of a particular topic, or to organizing some internal Wikipedia process.
Please see the Guide to WikiProjects and the Directory of WikiProjects for more information.
Welcome to the Cricket WikiProject on the English Wikipedia!
We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to cricket. Do join us and contribute to the project's development. If you are interested, please add your name to the list of project members.
If you have any questions about the project, or about any aspect of cricket in general, please use our project talk page and someone will try to give you an answer as soon as possible.
create and maintain articles about all people and subjects that are notable in cricketing terms
maintain an efficient and navigable category system to ensure that all cricket-related articles can easily be found by interested readers
create and maintain templates useful for editing and standardising cricket-related articles
update and maintain Category:Cricket templates as the root of a comprehensive, well-structured and navigable category system for all cricket-related templates
increase the number of well-written cricket-related articles by expanding all stubs to start-class and improving all start-class articles to B-class at least
accurately classify the status and importance of all cricket-related articles
co-ordinate team efforts and peer review cricket-related articles
keep Portal:Cricket and Current sports events up-to-date, particularly when international matches take place and the major domestic titles are decided
keep Recent deaths and Current sports events up to date when a notable cricketer dies (in addition, sad though it is, a newspaper obituary presents an opportunity to improve the cricketer's biography)
The following cricket-related articles have been recently updated or created (note: this is not a complete list, just a list of articles which WikiProject Cricket participants wish to bring to the attention of other participants):
Project members are listed at WP:CRICMEM. Feel free to add your name and join us. You may use the {{WikiProject Cricket/Welcome}} template to invite other users to join the project.
Here is a centralised place to announce the recent deaths of cricketing people. Newspaper obituaries can be a good source of material for improving the articles. Consider updating Recent deaths.
WikiProject Cricket participants have adopted the following guidelines for notability of a cricket person to qualify as the subject of an article in Wikipedia:
has appeared in at least one major cricket match since 1697 as a player or umpire
has appeared in at least one ICC Trophy match since 2005, or in an ICC Trophy final prior to 2005, as a player or umpire
Note that the term "first-class cricket" can be misleading because, officially, it did not begin until 1947 and should not be applied retrospectively according to the ICC definition. In practice the term is loosely applied to major cricket matches since the 17th century (i.e., to major matches played eleven-a-side with two innings each). But it is better to think of major cricket as an all-embracing term that includes modern limited overs cricket and historic single wicket cricket as well as first-class. Hence, a player who represented Kent in the inter-county match in 1709 is equally as notable as a player who represented Kent CCC's first team in any recent major tournament.
In addition, non-players who have made a notable contribution to cricket should have pages. These include umpires (as above), patrons, benefactors, administrators, coaches, writers, broadcasters, historians and so on. With these, it is important to ensure that the article's content outlines the person's notability in terms of his or her contribution to the sport. There is bound to be a more subjective view of such contributions whereas an appearance in a major cricket match enables a purely objective view to be taken.
Note especially that the person must have earned notability in their own right; they are not notable if they are only a member of a club, even if the club is notable.
Clubs
Cricket clubs with first-class teams are automatically qualified under the conditions of WP:N and WP:ORG. Difficulty may arise with clubs that have not competed at first-class level. It is necessary to take an individual view about each country in terms of its own grassroots structure. WP:CRIC has decided that:
for Australia, clubs that have played at Grade cricket level—the highest level below the state representative team—meet notability requirements. These clubs are the actual clubs that Australian international players belong to, state and national teams are representative selections.
General
Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted; conversely, the meeting of any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept. These are merely rules of thumb which some editors choose to keep in mind when deciding whether or not to keep an article that is on articles for deletion. But, the terms of WP:ATHLETE and WP:ORG are binding and these must be quoted if difficulty arises in an AfD discussion.
Finally, please keep in mind that the article in question must actually document that the criterion is true. It is not enough to make vague claims in the article or rant about a person's importance on a talk page or AfD page: the article itself must document notability, and preferably in the lead. For example, the introductory text of the article must make clear that the subject is a major, first-class or ListA cricketer.
Whilst naming and editing cricket-related articles, editors often encounter recurring questions of style. Wikiproject Cricket participants have agreed to the following style guidelines to keep a consistent look and feel to cricket articles throughout Wikipedia. These styles also fall within the WP:MOS guidelines and WP:NC policies.
In biographical articles, players are referred to as [[cricket]]er, and not [[cricketer]] (a redirect/disambig), or [[cricket]] player.
Always use capital T when referring to Test cricket and in any situation where the definite article is part of a title: e.g., a match at The Oval, England won The Ashes. Note that in a phrase such as "an Oval record" or "an Ashes match", the definite article is inappropriate.
If using a form such as W G Grace in the body of an article, ensure that it is redirected to one of the acceptable title forms – e.g., WG Grace
The title of a biography must reflect the person's used name and must NOT display a nickname unless it can be categorically proven that the nickname is the person's used name. For example, John Berry Hobbs was universally called Jack Hobbs; Ernest James Smith was universally known as Tiger Smith. Conversely, none of Ian Botham's many nicknames are his used name and his article must be entitled Ian Botham. It is fair comment to mention a nickname within the body of the article but it must never replace the subject's used name.
Bowling format: Use "5/100", which indicates that a bowler has captured 5 wickets while giving away 100 runs.
Team score format: Adopt the consensus style of writing in the host country of the tournament, i.e. 1/141 or one for 141 for matches in Australia, and 141/1 or 141 for one for most other countries. Use slashes when shortening scores.
When referring to national teams, link the name to the team page of that country, not the general article about that country; e.g., England not England. Similarly for domestic teams.
When listing the national team of players, if they are from a country in the West Indies, West Indies (rather than e.g.,Guyana) should be used. If a player is Welsh, England, rather than Wales, should be used. If a player has yet to play for a national team, the team they are eligible to play for (and in the case of multiple eligibility, where they primarily play their domestic cricket) should be used.
The statistics given for players include all matches recognised by the ICC, such as the 2005 Super Series and the Tsunami ODI. The article can of course also mention statistics derived in different ways where relevant.