Wikipedia talk:Foldoc license

Wikipedia:Foldoc license is permanently protected from editing, as it is a page which should not be edited significantly for legal or other reasons. Substantial changes should be proposed here, and made by administrators if the proposal is uncontroversial, or has been discussed and is supported by consensus. Use {{editprotected}} to attract the attention of an administrator in such cases.

Shouldn't this page be protected? --Anon

Yeah, I guess so. Protected. --mav

It appears as if the "Edit this page" option could be removed on protected pages, such as the Wikipedia:Foldoc license. /Wikiborg

FOLDOC is *not* a "public domain resource"

See also: Wikipedia:Public domain resources

I don't see how that link relates to anything. What do public domain resources have to do with FOLDOC? FOLDOC is not a public domain work; it is restricted under United Kingdom copyright law and international treaties and licensed to the public under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Shouldn't this notice be changed to point to GFDL resources, of which FOLDOC is one, instead of public-domain resources? --Damian Yerrick (☎) 15:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Yes. The 'see also' notice is obviously wrong. It must be changed to point to "Wikipedia:GNU Free Documentation License resources". --Kanjy 10:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. Ral315 (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2006 (UTC)